My general teaching philosophy rely on the assumptions that classical lecture should be used as a bonus and a motivating communication between a teacher and a student. To support this workflow and basically eliminating so called classical lecture component, a peer instruction methodology can be applied. For that, integrated course design is used in all my main subjects where I’m responsible for the full course delivery (including theory/lectures/webinars and practice/homework). The concept of the peer instruction is to engage students during various activities during the class (including both – contact hours, webinars, as well as e-learning). Students should apply the core concepts that they have read/studied prior to a class/webinar and also be able to explain those concepts to their fellow students. Collaboration is a key workflow that students face when they step into real world. And course itself should develop various skills in its learners. Therefore I do use various assessment methods throughout the course life-cycle, including each and every student in the learning process from the very beginning. It is just the opposite of so called common lectures where students should ask informal questions during a lecture. The downside is that only couple of students are activated who are highly motivated. To support peer instruction philosophy, I have designed my courses as e-learning courses, where students are not just getting learning materials but they have to be involved in the learning process topic by topic. A general design about my main courses is given in the following image.

From the image above, various learning activities are involved during the course. Each student is able to move in his/her own pace but learning outcomes are integrated with continuous feedback/assessment components and/or activities. An example of this is that each student should be able to ask constructive questions about course main topics after each module (module equals to subtopic) as well as answer to other student’s question. Questions/answers are evaluated by the teacher but also students can evaluate themselves (was the question/answer helpful for them as well), as well as any other homework that is given to student, should be finished correctly enabling her/him to learn from her/his mistakes. The goal I’m using that methodology is to engage students and develop their various skills throughout the course, including: being able to ask constructive questions (forum), develop the courage to support/answer fellow student question (forums), problem solving skills (real world example as an assessment), writing skills (essay) and group work/collaboration/presentation skills (project). In each of those learning/studying components a student workflow is actively supported by myself as a teacher. It is not about answering to all of the forum posts, but about supporting students that they do not feel alone in the course. I have been using such methodologies especially with more recent subjects (BIM subjects, water pipelines and modelling) and always seeing an improvement through student’s feedback. It is important that a teacher gathers student’s feedback and take that into account as smoothly as possible to develop the course further.

One key component while developing course materials is that students do learn differently and therefore, I prepare learning materials for various types of students. In general, it means that I duplicate course materials in various formats. For example, giving a module theory and/or practical component as a full step-by-step text material but also as a video (edited, so that unnecessary pauses/mistakes are removed). As such, students can choose which material is more suitable for them. Statistically (while asking student’s feedback at the end of course) I get very supportive feedback for my methods. Altogether I can conclude that about 70% of students prefer video-based learning material and 30% step-by-step text materials. Of course both materials can be also used at different time moments. But it clearly states that I can’t remove one or the other from my course materials (for example leaving only video-based learning materials).

My goal during a course is to teach various skills. As mentioned, before I encourage students to ask questions what moved them or confused during self-learning process (module by module basis). Because those components can be easily made as must dos during a learning process and evaluated against question’s / answer’s constructiveness, I have seen that quite many students are not able to ask questions about learning subject. On the other side, it is an important aspect to know and learn, because real life is expecting that people are active and collaborative. So, this brings us back to a so-called classical lecture, where couple of people are engaged and keen on to ask questions because they can do it. But we can’t evenly say about other people (who do not ask questions) that they do not want to ask. Perhaps they need to be taught through a learning process itself to ask questions. A successful e-learning can enhance such skills development.

During a course delivery (contact hours, e-learning) I’m passionate to offer modern ways of learning. Therefore, I incorporate tools that are used by real life practitioners as well as I have found to add value into learning process through my own learning process. For a general e-learning and course delivery platform I use well known Moodle platform. Moodle as a massive open online course (MOOC) platform has great and modern tools and possibilities to engage students during their participation. While for theoretical background I’m mostly using peer instruction method (students should actively participate asking questions and giving answers to other fellow students). Based on the type of questions that dominate in forums I can make conclusion in where I should concentrate more during a contact hour (incl webinar). From practical side I use different methods to help building up student’s ability to apply her/his understandings. Those include problem solving tasks in form of online quizzes as well as presenting results through industry standard tools as homework. All those exercises are individually evaluated (or group-based, depending on a course) and personal feedback given with suggestions to accomplish learning goals if some mistakes are found, and student needs to represent the result/homework. All those individual and collaborative (participating in forums) skills are connected into group-based project study that comes from the real life. In here students practice working in teams as well as finding answers together as a team, sharing responsibilities.

My general course planning is built on top of integrated course design methodology. This methodology should connect learning goals, teaching and learning activities as well as feedback and assessment into one ecosystem where those components relate with each other. The question that comes up into my mind when designing a course can be asked like so, “What could be ‘that thing’ that I hope students have learned from my course that is still there and has been a great value for their career, even after several years later from the course ending?” Of course, the answer lies behind learning goals and what are the methods to achieve those goals. If we can take the real-world example that is current need or focus in work sector today and build our course around it, finding all the sub-tasks (goals) that are needed to achieve the major goal – we help to remember and most importantly connect the university subject with real things and industry needs.

An example of this is the most recent course that I have developed those principles in mind – BIM for infrastructure (InfraBIM) basics. I have taken a real-world example in where BIM process is explained, and applied to help design teams to stay connected, find problems in the design as early as possible (before the real construction starts) and keep the construction itself in schedule or see possible resource deficiencies on-time. To fulfil the major goal, various sub goals should be successfully learned/studied.

During the course my goal is to keep an eye on how students’ progress and if they are struggling somewhere in between, helping them to get on track and encourage ask questions from where they get stuck. After the course I’m also keen on doing learning analytics about my course participants. My goals here is to understand the behaviour of different student groups (for example students who come from study programs vs students who are participating through open university program). Common conclusions can be used to avoid typical issues next semester. I have analysed some of my main subjects in detail. Please note that all of my courses are open courses, and more information (including the layout and content of the course) can be easily seen once clicked on the course webpage. Several conference proceedings are also available which presents some more learning analytics:

[1] Enhancing motivation and skills development in building information modelling for infrastructure topics by using active learning methods

[2] Investigating the Drop-Out Rate from a BIM Course

[3] Investigating the drop-out rate from a BIM for infrastructure course

 

Example 1: Building information modelling basics (BIM I)

General information about the course:

• 6 ECTS (16 weeks)
• Concentrates onto vertical BIM side (buildings)
• Covers cycles of BIM like preliminary design, energy analysis, design, construction (4D/5D), collaboration
• Products used, include: Autodesk FormIt, Autodesk Revit, Autodesk Navisworks, 3ds Max, Autodesk Viewer
• Assessment/homework: Self-assessment tests (graded), preliminary house project (150 m², 2 story, carried out in groups – collaboration skills development goal)

Course starts with a general introduction and introductory lectures/webinars. Because course is designed as an e-learning course, most of the work during semester is with peer instruction, where a teacher is giving continuous feedback individually as well as with general forum/video posts to the course participants. Additional contact hours (webinars) are based on questions/topics where students need more help. Course project is group-based (3 students in a group) and reflects the knowledge from course sub-topics. Course ends with project presentation skills. Based on student’s continuous activity recordings and feedback, course analytics is carried out. Some statistics is given in the sub-section. It is important to note how some statistics has changed over the years due to different study groups.

Course learning analytics across the study years and based on two different study groups (open university, study program):

As a simple conclusion, the “BIM I” course is getting more students over the years when a full e-learning started. We can see a slight increase in the completion rate as well. “BIM I” course is taken by open university students quite considerably, but the completion rate is quite low and because the drop-out happens at the very beginning of the course, it clearly states that the students were attending with a bit different assumption. Meaning that they do not perform any modelling tasks which is a need to keep moving (practical work starts from the second module). The general increase of the completion rate is also connected with the reason that in 2018-2019 this course was not compulsory for quite many students and obviously we can see a drop-out once there are easier ways to get your semester credits. But as the course now is compulsory, students are keener on to finish the course.

Motivation to continue with the course as measured after each module (scale: 1-5, average value over all participants) and general understanding of the key topic (scale: 2-5) (2020 spring):

Motivation scale:
[5] Motivation has increased significantly
[4] The motivation has rather increased
[3] The motivation is rather reduced
[2] Motivation has clearly decreased
[1] I have no clear motivation to move forward

Understanding of BIM scale:
[5] Significantly clearer
[4] Rather clearer
[3] Rather confusing
[2] Significantly more confusing

As it was mentioned earlier, the course has been set up so that students are reflecting their knowledge, understanding and motivation in various ways. One way to check it, is just by asking how they feel about the general knowledge of the current topic and what is their current motivation to continue with the course (after finishing up module by module). Statistics is an average over all students, including those who did not participated to the end (so mid-results can affect the general average). In general, we can see a positive change in terms of an average understanding and motivation (both do increase over time). 

 

Example 2: BIM for infrastructure (InfraBIM) basics

General information about the course:

• 6 ECTS (16 weeks)
• Concentrates onto horizontal BIM side (infrastructure, roads, etc.)
• Covers cycles of BIM like preliminary design, cost calculations for preliminary design alternatives, design, virtual design and construction (4D/5D), collaboration
• Products used, include: Autodesk InfraWorks, Autodesk Civil 3D, AutoCAD Raster Design, Infrakit, Autodesk Navisworks, Autodesk 3ds Max, 3ds max Interactive, Magnet Explorer, Autodesk Viewer
• Assessment/homework: Active participation in course forums (graded), self-assessment tests (graded), assessments for each BIM cycle (uploaded project files, individual feedback from teacher, design area of 1 km²)

Course starts with a general introduction and introductory lectures. Because course is designed as an e-learning course, most of the work during semester is with peer instruction, where a teacher is giving continuous feedback individually as well as with general forum/video posts to the course participants. Course layout is designed so that each main module expects student’s active participation in forum where she/he should ask constructive questions in where some additional explanation is needed. Also, they need to answer to their fellow student’s questions. Forum participation is graded against participation constructiveness and grading is done by the teacher as well as by fellow students. Each student should participate to be able to move forward in the course. Each module has its own self-assessment quiz. Additional contact hours (webinars) are based on questions/topics where students need more help. Individual assessments are built upon some Estonian’s town area. They start from preliminary design (using tools that enable to grab base model data from a given Estonian town) and master that same data through various BIM cycles to get the general but practical idea about BIM workflows. Based on student’s continuous activity recordings and feedback, course analytics is carried out. Some statistics is given in the sub-section. Statistics is based on different study groups.

Course learning analytics across the study years and based on two different study groups (open university, study program):

There is some increase in terms of the number of students. The general completion rate is higher than in “BIM I” course. This can be explained with a fact that group is smaller, and they might support each-other in terms of sharing ideas or helping to resolve some key issues. It can be also due to the reason that group itself in terms of a particular study year is more united. 

Motivation to continue with the course as measured after each module (scale: 1-5, average value over all participants)(2020 spring):

Motivation scale:
[5] Motivation has increased significantly
[4] The motivation has rather increased
[3] The motivation is rather reduced
[2] Motivation has clearly decreased
[1] I have no clear motivation to move forward

Understanding of BIM scale:
[5] Significantly clearer
[4] Rather clearer
[3] Rather confusing
[2] Significantly more confusing

Same statistics in terms of learning analytics is given here as well. We can see some decrease in motivation to continue, but overall, the fluctuation is very small and of course in here one demotivated student may influence the graph a lot more due to a small group of people. While comparing with the understanding of BIM curve, we can see some correlation in here and the lack of motivation could have come from a difficult/confusing/harder module and they just do not know what to expect next.

 

Example 3: Building Information Management and Modelling (BIM II)

General information about the course:

• 6 EAP (16 weeks)
• Concentrates onto horizontal/vertical BIM side (across the lifecycle)
• Covers cycles of BIM like BIM strategy, preliminary design, detailed design, as-built model, BIM in facility management etc.
• Products used, include: Autodesk Revit, Autodesk Civil 3D, Trimble Connect
• Assessment/homework: Self-assessment tests (graded), project from previous course (EPX5531 or ETT032) carried out in groups – collaboration skills development goal)

Course starts with a general introduction and introductory lectures/webinars. Because course is designed as an e-learning course, most of the work during semester is with peer instruction, where a teacher is giving continuous feedback individually as well as with general forum/video posts to the course participants. Additional contact hours (webinars) are based on questions/topics where students need more help. Course project is group-based (3 students in a group) and reflects the knowledge from course sub-topics. Course ends with project presentation skills. Based on student’s continuous activity recordings and feedback, course analytics is carried out. This course has been under major development throughout the 2020-2021 period, to include the same e-learning methodology as in all other courses and as such, fully completed version is live in Autumn 2021. Therefore, no learning analytics is not yet available.

Example 4: Water Pipelines and Modelling

General information about the course:

• 9 ECTS (16 weeks)
• Concentrates onto water network modelling in the urban environment with the connection to building information modelling
• Covers cycles of modelling theory, assembling the model, model calibration, model’s use cases for water company, transients in hydraulic systems and BIM in the water sector
• Products used, include: EPANET, Bentley WaterGEMS, Bentley HAMMER, Autodesk Civil 3D, Autodesk InfraWorks
• Assessment/homework: Self-assessment tests (graded), water network model from a given Estonian town area (1×1 km)

Course starts with a general introduction and introductory lectures/webinars. Because course is designed as an e-learning course, most of the work during semester is with peer instruction, where a teacher is giving continuous feedback individually as well as with general forum/video posts to the course participants. Additional contact hours (webinars) are based on questions/topics where students need more help. Course project is individual and reflects the knowledge from course sub-topics. Course ends with project presentation skills. Based on student’s continuous activity recordings and feedback, course analytics is carried out. Some statistics is given in the sub-section. It is important to note how some statistics has changed over the years due to different study groups.

Course learning analytics across the study years and based on two different study groups (open university, study program):

This course has been in a low registration period for some years (2018-2019) but then once a study program was up and running again, the number of participants is back (2020). The overall completion level is around 70% (2017, 2020) which is quite a same as in other courses. This course was changed considerably for 2020 semester to be ready fore future updates in where the number of credit points will be 6 ECTS.

Motivation to continue with the course as measured after each module (scale: 1-5, average value over all participants)(2020 autumn):

Motivation scale:
[5] Motivation has increased significantly
[4] The motivation has rather increased
[3] The motivation is rather reduced
[2] Motivation has clearly decreased
[1] I have no clear motivation to move forward

Understanding of WDN (water distribution networks) scale:
[5] Significantly clearer
[4] Rather clearer
[3] Rather confusing
[2] Significantly more confusing

Motivation and the knowledge of the topic are quite high in this course. The mid-section has some decrease but the fluctuations are very small.

---

All my courses include a major discussion component (graded) in where all students were asked to participate and add at least one constructive question about module’s topic and answer to other, fellow student’s question/comment before they were able to move forward in the course. What is interesting to note is the fact that approximately 50% of all students are eager, willing, or simply saying, – able to ask constructive questions. That is something to worry about, because in the classroom we usually see only couple of students who are asking, and assuming that other students simply do not have or are too shy to ask. But we should worry if, based on current studies, they are not able to ask questions at all. This is a real need when students go to work and are able to ask questions. But if they can’t? Through a compulsory question/answer assessment (50% in that terms is a good number anyway when compared with couple of students from the lecture room) we should be able to get more people involved and help to prepare more students for the real professional work-life. Student feedback can be found from Appendix A.

---

I have supervised two PhD students to successful completion and currently co-supervising one PhD student who plan to defend his thesis in 2021. My goal during a supervision is to see that student is motivated to work on with a given subject. It is vital that understanding about the problem that she/he tries to solve has clear boundaries and it is supported by the research community. As such a successful problem solving starts from the investigations what has been carried out before, in other words from the state of the art literature review. Once that step is secured, and problem itself that student is trying to focus on, is unique – the process of finding and applying suitable solution methodology starts. In here it is important that student presents her/his findings publicly to develop presentation skills and getting feedback and encouragement that she/he is on right track. During a final stage of studies I see quite problematic that fine tuning of the thesis is less appreciated by the applicant. Somewhat understood but not accepted, because detailing and fine tuning plays important role what differentiates good work from superior piece of work. Therefore a supervisor should pay attention at that final time period very carefully and motivate students to keep going after several small but important revisions/additions. While supervising PhD students, my goal is to make the work internationally visible. Therefore I’m trying to find opponents that do have a great experience in the same topic area and can add value or constructive comments to the work itself.